Discovery News - With 116 years separating the first moden Olympics from this year's
games, there are bound to be some noticeable changes between the two.
Aside from archived photos of the Olympics, one of clearest windows into
the first modern Olympics held in 1896 is from G. S. Robertson in an
essay titled, "An Englishman at the first modern Olympics" (via
Longform.org).
Robertson's account of the 1896 paints a picture of an Olympics in
its infancy that, while grappling with the challenges of hosting an
international competition without the benefits of modern
telecommunications or transporation, still manages to capture what would
be described in later generations as the Olympic spirit.
If you can manage to squeeze it in between commercial breaks while
watching this year's Olympics, Robertson's essay is worth the full read.
For those short on time, here are the starkest contrasts between this
year's games and the 1896 Olympics:
PHOTOS: Top 25 Iconic Olympic Moments
Entry requirements for the 1896 Olympics: Show up.
Organized by Pierre de Coubertin, considered the father of the modern
Olympic movement, the first modern games in Athens in 1896 was meant to
include the participation of as many nations from as many corners of
the world as possible. As Robertson notes, however, the promoters of the
first Olympics had "apparently forgotten that few athletes are
classical scholars, and that still fewer have either the time or the
money to make so long a voyage."
This meant that a disproportionate number of participants were from
the home country, Greece, other nations in continental Europe, and the
United States. The United States and Hungary were the only ones to
attempt to send an all-around team, according to Robertson. In fact, the
first Olympic champion in modern history was an American, triple-jumper
James Connolly.
More